| What is GRF |
|
The majority of the Earmarked Research Grant (ERG)
of the Research Grants Council (RGC) is allocated in response to competitive bids for grants
for academic research projects. GRF stands for "General Research Fund" and is
the major annual funding execise of the RGC to support academic research in the UGC-funded
institutions. All GRF proposals are subject to a rigorous peer review process via the RGC's four subject panels supported by an
international network of expert referees. The closing date for applications is usually the end
of October.
|
|
Applications for research project grants are assessed
by the relevant subject panel assisted by a number of external expert referees from all over
the world. The RGC currently has a database of more than 8,000 experts whose services may be
called upon to assess applications for research project grants.
|
| |
Eligibility
Generally, full time academic staff of UGC-Funded Institutions from Staff Grades 'A' to 'I' who
are primarily engaged in and spending at least 80% of time in degree or higher degree work at
the institution proper; and whose salaries are being wholly funded by the institution proper are
eligible to apply. Please contact your "Research Office" for full details of the eligibility criteria.
|
| |
Types of Research
The funding policy of the RGC is to support as many worthwhile research projects as possible
with the funds available. The Council encourages and supports both basic and applied research
and no disciplinary priorities are laid down.
Academic Research
i. basic research - research for the sake of advancing the frontiers of knowledge regardless
of whether it would provide immediate benefit to mankind; and
ii. applied research - efforts directed at meeting certain functional requirements which involve
the application of theories to specific areas or for specific purpose, and/or enhance man's
existence in the short to medium term.
|
|
Criteria for Consideration of Competitive Bids
The following criteria are used in considering competitive bids :
a. academic quality;
b. institutional commitment;
c. contribution to academic/professional development (where applicable);
d. potential for social, cultural or economic application; and
e. availability of, and potential for, non-RGC funding.
Items (b)-(e) above to be accorded equal weight, but all to be subject to (a). As regards item (e), members have agreed that the availability of matching non-RGC funding (eg from industry or Government departments) should be taken into account. As regards item (a), members have agreed that "academic quality" should cover :
- scientific and scholarly merit of the proposal;
- qualifications and track record of the (principal) investigator(s);
- originality;
- feasibility within the time-scale of the proposal.
|
|